PhytoNexus

PhytoNexus

Department of Pharmacognosy · Herb-Drug Interaction Intelligence Platform · generated 27 Jul 2026 01:04 IST
Asparagaceae · source entry 11

Asparagus racemosus

Shatavari

Tier 2 · Verified 3 curated · 1 predicted 3Major Risk index 61.8
Interaction profile

01 Identity and provenance

Accepted binomial
Asparagus racemosus
Common names
Shatavari
Family (APG IV)
Asparagaceae
Part used
Root
Verification tier
Tier 2 · Verified Clinical columns reviewed and a source is on record.
Reviewer note (2026 audit)
Reference not supplied - claim unverified against primary literature.

02 Constituent chemistry

Chemical classMarker compoundSynthetic analogue in use
Steroidal saponins Shatavarin IV ,
Sarsasapogenin
Root
None

The analogue column is what makes the interaction reasoning tractable: where a constituent has a marketed structural counterpart, the counterpart's interaction profile is the starting hypothesis for the plant.

Looking up structures and physicochemical properties from PubChem…

03 Stated application

Reported activity
Female reproductive health,
Anti-ulcer , Menopausal symptom relief
Marketed in
Capsule: Shatavari capsule
Churna : Shatavari churna
Reported adverse effects
Mild stomach upset, Nausea, Diarrhea,Abdominal discomfort

04 Interaction matrix

Source column, verbatim: Anti-diabetic drugs Diuretics, hormonal drugs
Normalised onto 3 canonical drug classes below.

Curated from the reviewed source

Drug classSeverityMechanism type ProvenanceExpected effect
Antidiabetic drugs (insulin, sulfonylureas, biguanides, GLP-1, SGLT2)
Endocrine
3Major PD-additive curated B Symptomatic hypoglycaemia, sweating, tremor, confusion; severe events rep… why ▾
Diuretics
Renal
3Major PD-additive + electrolyte-mediated curated B Hypokalaemia, hyponatraemia, dehydration, muscle weakness, cramps, arrhyt… why ▾
Hormonal therapy, oral contraceptives and HRT
Endocrine
3Major PK-CYP3A4 induction + PD-oestrogenic curated B Breakthrough bleeding and contraceptive failure; unpredictable effect in … why ▾

Predicted from constituent chemistry

These edges are not clinical findings. Each one is a rule inference: a constituent class in this plant is known to act on a target that the drug class also acts on. They are shown because a blank cell reads as “safe”, and for a Tier 1 entry a blank cell only means “not yet looked at”. Treat them as a literature-search agenda, not as a warning.
Drug classSeverityMechanism type ProvenanceExpected effect
Antiplatelet agents
Haemostasis
3Major PD-additive predicted D Prolonged bleeding time, surgical and post-procedural bleeding, bruising,… why ▾

05 Hazard register

The audit recorded no hazard beyond the interaction profile. The controlled-vocabulary field reads not assessed, which means the assessment has not been done rather than that it came back clear.

06 Confusable material

No same-genus or shared-common-name entry in the corpus.

07 Mechanism map

Chemistry sorts to the left, pharmacology to the right. Dashed edges are predicted. Drag nodes, scroll to zoom, export at 3× for a figure.

species
chemical class
marker compound
drug class
expected effect
hazard

08 Open literature

Abstract-scoped query built from this binomial, its common names and its marker compounds, run live against Europe PMC, PubMed and OpenAlex, then ranked locally against an evidence hierarchy.

Checking openFDA spontaneous reports…

09 Isomechanistic neighbours

Species whose interaction profile overlaps this one, ranked by shared severity weight rather than by count — a shared contraindication counts for more than a shared minor signal. Practical use: these are the plants you should not stack with this one, because the mechanisms summate.

SpeciesFamilyShared classes WeightJaccard
Gymnema sylvestre
Gurmar
Apocynaceae 3 0.75
Tribulus terrestris
Gokshura
Zygophyllaceae 3 0.75
Achyranthes aspera
Apamarga
Amaranthaceae 3 0.75
Sapindus mukorossi
Reetha
Sapindaceae 3 0.75
Cheilocostus speciosus
Kebuka
Costaceae 3 0.75
Dioscorea villosa
Wild Yam
Dioscoreaceae 3 0.75

10 References and notes

No citation is on record for this entry. That is itself the finding: the audit flagged it, and it is why the entry does not carry an A evidence grade.

Curator notes

No notes yet.

Sign in to add notes and save monographs.