PhytoNexus

PhytoNexus

Department of Pharmacognosy · Herb-Drug Interaction Intelligence Platform · generated 27 Jul 2026 01:05 IST
Arecaceae · source entry 187

Areca catechu

Areca Nut

Tier 2 · Verified 1 curated · 3 predicted 4Contraindicated Risk index 85.2
Interaction profile
CARCINOGEN CLASSIFICATION - IARC GROUP 1; ORAL SUBMUCOUS FIBROSI

01 Identity and provenance

Accepted binomial
Areca catechu
Common names
Areca Nut
Family (APG IV)
Arecaceae
Part used
Seed
Verification tier
Tier 2 · Verified Clinical columns reviewed and a source is on record.
Reviewer note (2026 audit)
Gupta PC & Ray CS. Areca nut use and cancer in India | PMC11414337 (OSMF prevalence) | VERIFIED 2026 - synthetic analogue, application, interactions, side effects and references populated from retrieved primary/regulatory sources (see References). Interaction entries are labelled CLINICAL (case reports or trials in humans) vs THEORETICAL (in-vitro or animal only). Marketed-formulation column intentionally left blank. | REGULATORY

02 Constituent chemistry

Chemical classMarker compoundSynthetic analogue in use
Pyridine alkaloids Arecoline
Seed
Pilocarpine (FUNCTIONAL - arecoline is a muscarinic agonist).

The analogue column is what makes the interaction reasoning tractable: where a constituent has a marketed structural counterpart, the counterpart's interaction profile is the starting hypothesis for the plant.

Looking up structures and physicochemical properties from PubChem…

03 Stated application

Reported activity
NO RECOMMENDED THERAPEUTIC USE. Historically an anthelmintic and masticatory. Listed here as a major public-health hazard, not as a therapy.
Reported adverse effects
IARC GROUP 1 CARCINOGEN (areca nut, with and without tobacco). Causes oral submucous fibrosis - irreversible, progressive trismus and dysphagia that persists after cessation; malignant transformation reported at 3-6%. Also leukoplakia, and cancer of oral cavity, pharynx and oesophagus. OSMF prevalence 12.9% in one Indian areca-user cohort. Associated with liver injury. Dependence-forming.

04 Interaction matrix

Source column, verbatim: CLINICAL: additive cholinergic effect; antagonism of anticholinergic drugs. Chewing with slaked lime hydrolyses arecoline to arecaidine, increasing carcinogenicity. Concurrent tobacco greatly amplifies risk.
Normalised onto 1 canonical drug class below.

Curated from the reviewed source

Drug classSeverityMechanism type ProvenanceExpected effect
Anticholinergics
Autonomic
4Contraindicated PD-additive curated A Anticholinergic toxidrome: dry mouth, urinary retention, blurred vision, … why ▾

Predicted from constituent chemistry

These edges are not clinical findings. Each one is a rule inference: a constituent class in this plant is known to act on a target that the drug class also acts on. They are shown because a blank cell reads as “safe”, and for a Tier 1 entry a blank cell only means “not yet looked at”. Treat them as a literature-search agenda, not as a warning.
Drug classSeverityMechanism type ProvenanceExpected effect
Cholinesterase inhibitors and cholinergic drugs
Autonomic
4Contraindicated PD-additive predicted D Cholinergic crisis: bradycardia, bronchorrhoea, bronchospasm, miosis, sei… why ▾
Narrow-therapeutic-index CYP3A4 substrates
Pharmacokinetic
4Contraindicated PK-CYP3A4 predicted D Toxic accumulation or subtherapeutic failure of the co-prescribed drug, s… why ▾
Antacids, PPIs and H2 blockers
Gastrointestinal
3Major PK-absorption predicted D Reduced or erratic absorption of alkaloids; heartburn and reflux from pre… why ▾

05 Hazard register

carcinogen classification - IARC Group 1; oral submucous fibrosi

06 Confusable material

No same-genus or shared-common-name entry in the corpus.

07 Mechanism map

Chemistry sorts to the left, pharmacology to the right. Dashed edges are predicted. Drag nodes, scroll to zoom, export at 3× for a figure.

species
chemical class
marker compound
drug class
expected effect
hazard

08 Open literature

Abstract-scoped query built from this binomial, its common names and its marker compounds, run live against Europe PMC, PubMed and OpenAlex, then ranked locally against an evidence hierarchy.

Checking openFDA spontaneous reports…

09 Isomechanistic neighbours

Species whose interaction profile overlaps this one, ranked by shared severity weight rather than by count — a shared contraindication counts for more than a shared minor signal. Practical use: these are the plants you should not stack with this one, because the mechanisms summate.

SpeciesFamilyShared classes WeightJaccard
Physostigma venenosum
Calabar Bean
Fabaceae 4 0.50
Duboisia myoporoides
Corkwood
Solanaceae 4 0.67
Galanthus nivalis
Snowdrop
Amaryllidaceae 4 0.80
Huperzia serrata
Chinese Club Moss
Lycopodiaceae 4 0.80
Atropa belladonna
Belladonna
Solanaceae 3 0.50
Hyoscyamus niger
Henbane
Solanaceae 3 0.50

10 References and notes

Source column: IARC Monographs Vol 85: Betel-quid and Areca-nut Chewing

IARC Monographs Vol 85: Betel-quid and Areca-nut Chewing

Official monograph manual
BibTeX for all 1 records
@article{anon,
  title = {IARC Monographs Vol 85: Betel-quid and Areca-nut Chewing},
}

Curator notes

No notes yet.

Sign in to add notes and save monographs.